THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DECENTRALIZATION IN HUNGARY AND SLOVAKIA, by Jean-Jacques Dethier, November 2000
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper contrasts decentralization in Hungary, one of the most decentralized countries of Central and Eastern Europe, and in Slovakia, one of the least decentralized, during the decade of transition from socialism to market. It also draws lessons based on this experience. Has decentralization been effective? Has decentralization improved the delivery of essential services? Has it promoted efficiency, ensured accountability and encouraged participation? We make the point that the effectiveness of decentralization depends on three crucial factors—which we document in this paper. First, appropriate expenditure and tax assignments. Second, governance mechanisms to strengthen accountability and fiduciary responsibility. Third, incentive mechanisms to ensure that agents deliver services of an acceptable quality at least cost. For constitutionally guaranteed entitlements like education, the latter condition is not easy to achieve because many principal-agent problems arise in the context of shared governance. We discuss this issue, using as an example education, a type of public good for which governance is typically shared between central and local levels of government. The Hungarian and Slovak experiences show that, even when expenditure assignments and accountability rules in intergovernmental affairs are specified by legislation, in practice, major expenditure management and public accountability issues still arise. We examine both fiscal and institutional aspects of decentralization—venturing into issues of accountability mechanisms and incentive schemes that are used to ensure balance between revenue and spending and minimum quality standards in the delivery of public goods. The role of incentives in determining how local organizations like schools operate is crucial. 2 The fiscal literature suggests that it is not possible to ensure incentive compatibility simultaneously with optimal allocation of resources and a balanced budget in the provision of
منابع مشابه
Liver transplantation in Central Europe
INTRODUCTION Transplant hepatologists convened in Warsaw on 20-21 November 2015 at a meeting of the Initiative Group for Central European Hepatologic Collaboration to exchange their experience in liver transplantation in their respective countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS The description is based on narration of individual country representatives, supplemented by data from additional queries, an...
متن کاملComparison of the Information Technology Development in Slovakia and Hungary
Nowadays the role of information is increasingly important, so every company has to provide the efficient procurement, processing, storage and visualization of this special resource in hope to stay competitive. More and more enterprises introduce Enterprise Resource Planning System to be able to perform the listed functions. The article illustrates the usage of these systems in Hungary and Slov...
متن کاملHepatology topics of special interest from Central Europe (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia)
This compilation represents abstracts of presentations at the first meeting of the Initiative Group for the Central European Hepatologic Collaboration (CEHC, Warsaw, 19-21 November, 2015) on topics with special interest from four Central European countries and includes a summary of a boceprevir-based triple therapy cohort programme (from Hungary), current trends and challenges in liver diseases...
متن کاملIncome disparities and convergence across regions of Central Europe
This paper deals with the analysis of regional income disparities of the net disposable income of households (in Euro per inhabitant) across the regions of Central Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary and Germany) during the period 2000-2013. The analysis deals with the 82 NUTS 2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) regions and is based on the concept of sigm...
متن کاملCzech Republic 2002. HiT summary
Reform decisions were made as a result of concerns in the late 1980s and early 1990s, about efficiency and raising the social status of providers, leading to fee-for-service reimbursement and privatization. However, these decisions resulted in problems such as overuse of services, especially specialist care, along with financial deficits and inadequate regulation. Measures are 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 E...
متن کامل